An old house, a geek, a cute transvestite, a very tall lesbian, and at least one ghost–what could happen? – Adult situations and artistic nudity. Not suitable for children.
What is “Cowlitz”? You may ask, especially if you’re not born and raised in Washington state.
Short answer: a native American tribe located in Washington state, which has a county of the same name.
Long answer is a wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowlitz_Indian_Tribe
Thank you. Saddest part of having the old site blown away like it was, losing all the information in the old comments. At least that is how I feel about it. Andy did a great job of putting everything back, but I’ve always enjoyed reading the comments whenever I do yet another archive dive.
I’ll be perfectly honest: I actually prefer it when there’s only a handful of comments. If there’s 30, or god forbid, over 100, I haven’t the patience/attention span to read them all. If it’s a choice between that and moving on to the next page, I have to go with the latter… but if there was only a few comments, I read them and move to the next page not feeling like I missed anything.
I think I’ve been involved in this conversation before on either Least I Could Do or Looking For Group. The earliest pages were almost like friends chatting with months or even years between responses as we replied on our next archive dive.
Then it started getting dozens of posts a day, and arguments and abuse were more likely than amusement.
It’s easier to read large comment pages if you were there at the time and reading them ‘in real time’, reading them decades later losses most of the relevance of the time
What is “Cowlitz”? You may ask, especially if you’re not born and raised in Washington state.
Short answer: a native American tribe located in Washington state, which has a county of the same name.
Long answer is a wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowlitz_Indian_Tribe
Thank you. Saddest part of having the old site blown away like it was, losing all the information in the old comments. At least that is how I feel about it. Andy did a great job of putting everything back, but I’ve always enjoyed reading the comments whenever I do yet another archive dive.
I’ll be perfectly honest: I actually prefer it when there’s only a handful of comments. If there’s 30, or god forbid, over 100, I haven’t the patience/attention span to read them all. If it’s a choice between that and moving on to the next page, I have to go with the latter… but if there was only a few comments, I read them and move to the next page not feeling like I missed anything.
I think I’ve been involved in this conversation before on either Least I Could Do or Looking For Group. The earliest pages were almost like friends chatting with months or even years between responses as we replied on our next archive dive.
Then it started getting dozens of posts a day, and arguments and abuse were more likely than amusement.
It’s easier to read large comment pages if you were there at the time and reading them ‘in real time’, reading them decades later losses most of the relevance of the time